Which scenario would require officers to provide a Miranda Warning?

The scenario that requires officers to provide a Miranda Warning occurs when questioning a suspect who is handcuffed in the back of a patrol car. This situation indicates that the individual is in a custodial setting, which is essential for the application of Miranda rights. The nature of the interrogation is significant here; once an individual is restrained and not free to leave, any questioning about their involvement in a crime requires that they be informed of their rights to ensure that any statements made during this interrogation are admissible in court.

Miranda rights serve to protect a suspect's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Therefore, if a suspect is in custody—indicated by being handcuffed and unable to exit the patrol vehicle—officers must provide a Miranda warning before any interrogation takes place. This warning allows the individual to understand their rights, such as the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.

In contrast, the scenarios involving interviewing a witness at a crime scene, talking casually to a suspect while they wait, and taking notes while a suspect gives a statement may not necessitate a Miranda Warning. These situations typically don't involve the individual being in custody or subjected to interrogation in a manner that would require the rights to be read.