What type of interrogation is more likely to require a Miranda Warning?

The type of interrogation that is more likely to require a Miranda Warning is a custodial interrogation. This is because custodial interrogations occur when a person is deprived of their freedom in a significant way, such as being formally arrested or placed in a police setting where they are not free to leave. Under these circumstances, the law mandates that individuals must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to have legal counsel present, as outlined in the Miranda v. Arizona ruling.

In contrast, informal questioning over coffee, field interviews at the scene, and voluntary statements given by the suspect do not typically meet the criteria for custodial interrogation. In these situations, a person is generally not in custody, meaning they are free to leave, and therefore, Miranda Warnings are not required. This understanding is crucial for peace officers to ensure that any statements made by a suspect during an interrogation can be admissible in court and that the individual's rights are protected.